Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - External Development Charges(EDC) paid to HUDA without deduction of tax at source - TDS on EDC u/s 194C/194I - The tribunal concluded that since the EDC payment to HUDA was deposited in the consolidated Fund of the State, no tax deduction was required, thereby affirming the deletion of the disallowance. - The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance of EDC expenditure.
Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - External Development Charges(EDC) paid to HUDA without deduction of tax at source - TDS on EDC u/s 194C/194I - The tribunal concluded that since the EDC payment to HUDA was deposited in the consolidated Fund of the State, no tax deduction was required, thereby affirming the deletion of the disallowance. - The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance of EDC expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
