Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - External Development Charges(EDC) paid to HUDA without deduction of tax at source - TDS on EDC u/s 194C/194I - The tribunal concluded that since the EDC payment to HUDA was deposited in the consolidated Fund of the State, no tax deduction was required, thereby affirming the deletion of the disallowance. - The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance of EDC expenditure.
Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - External Development Charges(EDC) paid to HUDA without deduction of tax at source - TDS on EDC u/s 194C/194I - The tribunal concluded that since the EDC payment to HUDA was deposited in the consolidated Fund of the State, no tax deduction was required, thereby affirming the deletion of the disallowance. - The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance of EDC expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
