Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rectification u/s 154 - Chargeability of interest u/s 234B and 234C - income returned u/s 115JB - The return was assessed under section 143(3) of the Act, and no interest was charged under sections 234B and 234C as per the prevailing law. - Subsequently, a search and seizure operation was conducted, leading to proceedings under section 153A. The CIT(A) deleted all additions made in the assessment order under section 153A. - However, while giving appeal effect to the CIT(A)'s order, the Assessing Officer introduced a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C, which was not part of the original assessment or appeal. - The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C during appeal effect.
Rectification u/s 154 - Chargeability of interest u/s 234B and 234C - income returned u/s 115JB - The return was assessed under section 143(3) of the Act, and no interest was charged under sections 234B and 234C as per the prevailing law. - Subsequently, a search and seizure operation was conducted, leading to proceedings under section 153A. The CIT(A) deleted all additions made in the assessment order under section 153A. - However, while giving appeal effect to the CIT(A)'s order, the Assessing Officer introduced a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C, which was not part of the original assessment or appeal. - The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C during appeal effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
