Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Rectification u/s 154 - Chargeability of interest u/s 234B and 234C - income returned u/s 115JB - The return was assessed under section 143(3) of the Act, and no interest was charged under sections 234B and 234C as per the prevailing law. - Subsequently, a search and seizure operation was conducted, leading to proceedings under section 153A. The CIT(A) deleted all additions made in the assessment order under section 153A. - However, while giving appeal effect to the CIT(A)'s order, the Assessing Officer introduced a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C, which was not part of the original assessment or appeal. - The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C during appeal effect.
Rectification u/s 154 - Chargeability of interest u/s 234B and 234C - income returned u/s 115JB - The return was assessed under section 143(3) of the Act, and no interest was charged under sections 234B and 234C as per the prevailing law. - Subsequently, a search and seizure operation was conducted, leading to proceedings under section 153A. The CIT(A) deleted all additions made in the assessment order under section 153A. - However, while giving appeal effect to the CIT(A)'s order, the Assessing Officer introduced a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C, which was not part of the original assessment or appeal. - The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing a new issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C during appeal effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
