Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Correct head of income - treatment of income from sale and purchase of shares - business income or income from capital gains - high volume of transactions and frequently investment in shares - The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to consider the nature of the transaction concerning the sale and purchase of shares and the treatment of legal expenses afresh. - The Tribunal considered various tests laid down by the High Court and other judgments to determine the nature of the transaction. It found that the appellant had purchased shares with the intention of being an investor and held them as investments, thus treating the gains as capital gains.
Correct head of income - treatment of income from sale and purchase of shares - business income or income from capital gains - high volume of transactions and frequently investment in shares - The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to consider the nature of the transaction concerning the sale and purchase of shares and the treatment of legal expenses afresh. - The Tribunal considered various tests laid down by the High Court and other judgments to determine the nature of the transaction. It found that the appellant had purchased shares with the intention of being an investor and held them as investments, thus treating the gains as capital gains.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
