Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Correct head of income - treatment of income from sale and purchase of shares - business income or income from capital gains - high volume of transactions and frequently investment in shares - The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to consider the nature of the transaction concerning the sale and purchase of shares and the treatment of legal expenses afresh. - The Tribunal considered various tests laid down by the High Court and other judgments to determine the nature of the transaction. It found that the appellant had purchased shares with the intention of being an investor and held them as investments, thus treating the gains as capital gains.
Correct head of income - treatment of income from sale and purchase of shares - business income or income from capital gains - high volume of transactions and frequently investment in shares - The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to consider the nature of the transaction concerning the sale and purchase of shares and the treatment of legal expenses afresh. - The Tribunal considered various tests laid down by the High Court and other judgments to determine the nature of the transaction. It found that the appellant had purchased shares with the intention of being an investor and held them as investments, thus treating the gains as capital gains.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.