Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS - Cigarette sticks were found stolen / Pilfered from the safe custody - The CESTAT held that the suspension, subject to facilitating existing consignments, is valid under Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations (HCCAR), 2019. However, the specific suspension period had expired, making the order non-implementable. - The appellant violated obligations under Regulations 5(1)(i)(n), 6(1)(f), and 6(1)(i) of HCCAR, justifying the penalty under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS - Cigarette sticks were found stolen / Pilfered from the safe custody - The CESTAT held that the suspension, subject to facilitating existing consignments, is valid under Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations (HCCAR), 2019. However, the specific suspension period had expired, making the order non-implementable. - The appellant violated obligations under Regulations 5(1)(i)(n), 6(1)(f), and 6(1)(i) of HCCAR, justifying the penalty under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
