Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS - Cigarette sticks were found stolen / Pilfered from the safe custody - The CESTAT held that the suspension, subject to facilitating existing consignments, is valid under Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations (HCCAR), 2019. However, the specific suspension period had expired, making the order non-implementable. - The appellant violated obligations under Regulations 5(1)(i)(n), 6(1)(f), and 6(1)(i) of HCCAR, justifying the penalty under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS - Cigarette sticks were found stolen / Pilfered from the safe custody - The CESTAT held that the suspension, subject to facilitating existing consignments, is valid under Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations (HCCAR), 2019. However, the specific suspension period had expired, making the order non-implementable. - The appellant violated obligations under Regulations 5(1)(i)(n), 6(1)(f), and 6(1)(i) of HCCAR, justifying the penalty under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
