Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS - Cigarette sticks were found stolen / Pilfered from the safe custody - The CESTAT held that the suspension, subject to facilitating existing consignments, is valid under Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations (HCCAR), 2019. However, the specific suspension period had expired, making the order non-implementable. - The appellant violated obligations under Regulations 5(1)(i)(n), 6(1)(f), and 6(1)(i) of HCCAR, justifying the penalty under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS - Cigarette sticks were found stolen / Pilfered from the safe custody - The CESTAT held that the suspension, subject to facilitating existing consignments, is valid under Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations (HCCAR), 2019. However, the specific suspension period had expired, making the order non-implementable. - The appellant violated obligations under Regulations 5(1)(i)(n), 6(1)(f), and 6(1)(i) of HCCAR, justifying the penalty under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
