Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dismissal of Section 9 for initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - The Adjudicating Authority held that the debt was time-barred as per the Limitation Act. It noted that 26 out of 27 invoices submitted by the Operational Creditor were more than three years old from the date of filing the Section 9 application, and no subsequent acknowledgment of liability was provided to extend the limitation period. - The Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's order.
Dismissal of Section 9 for initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - The Adjudicating Authority held that the debt was time-barred as per the Limitation Act. It noted that 26 out of 27 invoices submitted by the Operational Creditor were more than three years old from the date of filing the Section 9 application, and no subsequent acknowledgment of liability was provided to extend the limitation period. - The Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.