Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - appeal barred by limitation or not - appeal was filed after a period of four months - Noting the significance of proper service of notice, the High Court emphasized the mandatory prerequisites for triggering the limitation period, including a finding on the mode of service and recording satisfaction regarding communication to the concerned party. - The Court observed deficiencies in the impugned order, specifically its failure to address the mode of service of the order and lack of satisfaction. - Setting aside the impugned order, the Court remitted the matter to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication.
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - appeal barred by limitation or not - appeal was filed after a period of four months - Noting the significance of proper service of notice, the High Court emphasized the mandatory prerequisites for triggering the limitation period, including a finding on the mode of service and recording satisfaction regarding communication to the concerned party. - The Court observed deficiencies in the impugned order, specifically its failure to address the mode of service of the order and lack of satisfaction. - Setting aside the impugned order, the Court remitted the matter to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
