Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - appeal barred by limitation or not - appeal was filed after a period of four months - Noting the significance of proper service of notice, the High Court emphasized the mandatory prerequisites for triggering the limitation period, including a finding on the mode of service and recording satisfaction regarding communication to the concerned party. - The Court observed deficiencies in the impugned order, specifically its failure to address the mode of service of the order and lack of satisfaction. - Setting aside the impugned order, the Court remitted the matter to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication.
Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - appeal barred by limitation or not - appeal was filed after a period of four months - Noting the significance of proper service of notice, the High Court emphasized the mandatory prerequisites for triggering the limitation period, including a finding on the mode of service and recording satisfaction regarding communication to the concerned party. - The Court observed deficiencies in the impugned order, specifically its failure to address the mode of service of the order and lack of satisfaction. - Setting aside the impugned order, the Court remitted the matter to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.