Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demand duty - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared as made of “100% Polyester” - mis-declaration the goods - The Tribunal observed that, the articles which have been imported by the respondent are woven fabric of synthetic filament yarn, but they are Bed spreads / Bed sheets and quantity of the goods in numbers has been described by the respondent. - The Tribunal held that the respondent's classification of the goods under CTH 6304 was correct, and they are not liable for confiscation. Additionally, it was determined that no penalty is imposable on the respondent, and no redemption fine is payable.
Demand duty - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared as made of “100% Polyester” - mis-declaration the goods - The Tribunal observed that, the articles which have been imported by the respondent are woven fabric of synthetic filament yarn, but they are Bed spreads / Bed sheets and quantity of the goods in numbers has been described by the respondent. - The Tribunal held that the respondent's classification of the goods under CTH 6304 was correct, and they are not liable for confiscation. Additionally, it was determined that no penalty is imposable on the respondent, and no redemption fine is payable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
