Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - sufficient cause for condoning the delay or not - The petitioner contended that despite the delay, their case had merit, particularly concerning an amendment to Section 11(1)(i) of the Haryana Special Economic Zone Act, 2005 (HSEZ Act), which impacted the respondent's exemption claim. - The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the appeals based on delay but refrained from delving into the merits. The Court noted that while the High Court correctly dismissed the appeals due to delay, it did not fully consider the merits, particularly concerning the amendment to the HSEZ Act.
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - sufficient cause for condoning the delay or not - The petitioner contended that despite the delay, their case had merit, particularly concerning an amendment to Section 11(1)(i) of the Haryana Special Economic Zone Act, 2005 (HSEZ Act), which impacted the respondent's exemption claim. - The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the appeals based on delay but refrained from delving into the merits. The Court noted that while the High Court correctly dismissed the appeals due to delay, it did not fully consider the merits, particularly concerning the amendment to the HSEZ Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
