Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - sufficient cause for condoning the delay or not - The petitioner contended that despite the delay, their case had merit, particularly concerning an amendment to Section 11(1)(i) of the Haryana Special Economic Zone Act, 2005 (HSEZ Act), which impacted the respondent's exemption claim. - The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the appeals based on delay but refrained from delving into the merits. The Court noted that while the High Court correctly dismissed the appeals due to delay, it did not fully consider the merits, particularly concerning the amendment to the HSEZ Act.
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - sufficient cause for condoning the delay or not - The petitioner contended that despite the delay, their case had merit, particularly concerning an amendment to Section 11(1)(i) of the Haryana Special Economic Zone Act, 2005 (HSEZ Act), which impacted the respondent's exemption claim. - The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the appeals based on delay but refrained from delving into the merits. The Court noted that while the High Court correctly dismissed the appeals due to delay, it did not fully consider the merits, particularly concerning the amendment to the HSEZ Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
