Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Accrual of income in India - period of stay in India - salary received by the assessee from his foreign employer - DTAA between India and USA - Revenue contended that, since the assessee was a resident and ordinarily resident in India during the year, therefore, the provisions of DTAA would not apply in the case of the assessee - the Tribunal found that the provisions of Article 16(2) of the DTAA are to be read together, and all conditions must be satisfied simultaneously to determine the tax liability of the assessee's foreign income. It held that the income earned by the assessee in the USA should be taxed in the USA, as the conditions under Clause (a), (b), and (c) of Article 16(2) were not fully met.
Accrual of income in India - period of stay in India - salary received by the assessee from his foreign employer - DTAA between India and USA - Revenue contended that, since the assessee was a resident and ordinarily resident in India during the year, therefore, the provisions of DTAA would not apply in the case of the assessee - the Tribunal found that the provisions of Article 16(2) of the DTAA are to be read together, and all conditions must be satisfied simultaneously to determine the tax liability of the assessee's foreign income. It held that the income earned by the assessee in the USA should be taxed in the USA, as the conditions under Clause (a), (b), and (c) of Article 16(2) were not fully met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
