Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of service tax on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism - The tribunal noted that considering this ground would amount to assessing a new refund claim which was not part of the original authority's consideration. The appellant's failure to challenge the assessment/payment led to the finality of the duty paid. - The CESTAT Allahabad dismissed an appeal for a refund of service tax paid on ocean freight, stating the appellant failed to make a valid case under the originally filed claim. The court indicated that a fresh refund claim must be pursued for issues relating to the levy's ultra vires status, adhering to principles regarding the amendment of claims and the finality of unchallenged assessments.
Refund of service tax on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism - The tribunal noted that considering this ground would amount to assessing a new refund claim which was not part of the original authority's consideration. The appellant's failure to challenge the assessment/payment led to the finality of the duty paid. - The CESTAT Allahabad dismissed an appeal for a refund of service tax paid on ocean freight, stating the appellant failed to make a valid case under the originally filed claim. The court indicated that a fresh refund claim must be pursued for issues relating to the levy's ultra vires status, adhering to principles regarding the amendment of claims and the finality of unchallenged assessments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.