Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - Burden/onus to prove - The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff, overturning the decision of the subordinate court. The court ruled that the plaintiff had adequately proved the execution of the promissory note, and the defendants failed to rebut the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court also rejected the defendants' arguments regarding non-impleading of a party and discrepancies in witness testimony.
Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - Burden/onus to prove - The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff, overturning the decision of the subordinate court. The court ruled that the plaintiff had adequately proved the execution of the promissory note, and the defendants failed to rebut the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court also rejected the defendants' arguments regarding non-impleading of a party and discrepancies in witness testimony.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
