Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - Burden/onus to prove - The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff, overturning the decision of the subordinate court. The court ruled that the plaintiff had adequately proved the execution of the promissory note, and the defendants failed to rebut the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court also rejected the defendants' arguments regarding non-impleading of a party and discrepancies in witness testimony.
Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - Burden/onus to prove - The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff, overturning the decision of the subordinate court. The court ruled that the plaintiff had adequately proved the execution of the promissory note, and the defendants failed to rebut the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court also rejected the defendants' arguments regarding non-impleading of a party and discrepancies in witness testimony.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
