Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - entitlement to exemption u/s 54F - The High Court examines Section 54F of the Act and concludes that the reassessment is based on a mere change of opinion, as the same facts were considered in previous assessments without disallowing the exemption under Section 54F.- Referring to the decision in Calcutta Discount Company Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, the Court holds that the petitioner is entitled to relief under Article 226 of the Constitution due to lack of jurisdiction by the Assessing Officer.
Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - entitlement to exemption u/s 54F - The High Court examines Section 54F of the Act and concludes that the reassessment is based on a mere change of opinion, as the same facts were considered in previous assessments without disallowing the exemption under Section 54F.- Referring to the decision in Calcutta Discount Company Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, the Court holds that the petitioner is entitled to relief under Article 226 of the Constitution due to lack of jurisdiction by the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
