Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Immunity to corporate debtors and their assets, upon approval of a resolution plan - jurisdiction of NCLT to release the attached properties by invoking Section 32A of the IBC, 2016? - Teh High Court held that the NCLT was within its jurisdiction to direct the ED to release the attached properties, based on the provisions of Section 32A, as it aims to ensure that the approved resolution plan can be effectively implemented. - The court emphasized that once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, 2016, and meets the criteria for immunity under Section 32A, the attached properties must be released to aid in the revival of the corporate debtor.
Immunity to corporate debtors and their assets, upon approval of a resolution plan - jurisdiction of NCLT to release the attached properties by invoking Section 32A of the IBC, 2016? - Teh High Court held that the NCLT was within its jurisdiction to direct the ED to release the attached properties, based on the provisions of Section 32A, as it aims to ensure that the approved resolution plan can be effectively implemented. - The court emphasized that once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, 2016, and meets the criteria for immunity under Section 32A, the attached properties must be released to aid in the revival of the corporate debtor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.