Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability of Lease Rent and Capital Replacement Fund - The appellant argued that lease rent was to be transferred to NOIDA authority and not for providing any services - The Tribunal found no basis for classifying these amounts under 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' or 'Business Auxiliary Services' as done by the lower authorities, especially when the appellant had already paid service tax on these amounts under 'Construction of Residential Complex Service' category.
Taxability of Lease Rent and Capital Replacement Fund - The appellant argued that lease rent was to be transferred to NOIDA authority and not for providing any services - The Tribunal found no basis for classifying these amounts under 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' or 'Business Auxiliary Services' as done by the lower authorities, especially when the appellant had already paid service tax on these amounts under 'Construction of Residential Complex Service' category.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
