Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability of Lease Rent and Capital Replacement Fund - The appellant argued that lease rent was to be transferred to NOIDA authority and not for providing any services - The Tribunal found no basis for classifying these amounts under 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' or 'Business Auxiliary Services' as done by the lower authorities, especially when the appellant had already paid service tax on these amounts under 'Construction of Residential Complex Service' category.
Taxability of Lease Rent and Capital Replacement Fund - The appellant argued that lease rent was to be transferred to NOIDA authority and not for providing any services - The Tribunal found no basis for classifying these amounts under 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' or 'Business Auxiliary Services' as done by the lower authorities, especially when the appellant had already paid service tax on these amounts under 'Construction of Residential Complex Service' category.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
