Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - The High court observed that cancellation with retrospective effect should be based on objective criteria and not merely due to non-filing of returns. - The consequences of retrospective cancellation, such as denial of input tax credit to customers, were considered. - Both the petitioner and the department sought cancellation of GST registration, albeit for different reasons. - The impugned order was modified, and the registration was treated as cancelled from the date of the show cause notice, i.e., 11.07.2023.
Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - The High court observed that cancellation with retrospective effect should be based on objective criteria and not merely due to non-filing of returns. - The consequences of retrospective cancellation, such as denial of input tax credit to customers, were considered. - Both the petitioner and the department sought cancellation of GST registration, albeit for different reasons. - The impugned order was modified, and the registration was treated as cancelled from the date of the show cause notice, i.e., 11.07.2023.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.