Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Validity of Conclusion of proceedings u/s 73 of the Central Good and Service Tax Act 2017 without considering the reply filed by the petitioner - The court noted that the impugned order did not adequately address the petitioner's response. Despite the petitioner's detailed explanation, the order merely stated that the reply was not comprehensive and failed to consider the merits of the petitioner's explanation. - Consequently, HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the proper officer for re-adjudication.
Validity of Conclusion of proceedings u/s 73 of the Central Good and Service Tax Act 2017 without considering the reply filed by the petitioner - The court noted that the impugned order did not adequately address the petitioner's response. Despite the petitioner's detailed explanation, the order merely stated that the reply was not comprehensive and failed to consider the merits of the petitioner's explanation. - Consequently, HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the proper officer for re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
