Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Validity of Conclusion of proceedings u/s 73 of the Central Good and Service Tax Act 2017 without considering the reply filed by the petitioner - The court noted that the impugned order did not adequately address the petitioner's response. Despite the petitioner's detailed explanation, the order merely stated that the reply was not comprehensive and failed to consider the merits of the petitioner's explanation. - Consequently, HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the proper officer for re-adjudication.
Validity of Conclusion of proceedings u/s 73 of the Central Good and Service Tax Act 2017 without considering the reply filed by the petitioner - The court noted that the impugned order did not adequately address the petitioner's response. Despite the petitioner's detailed explanation, the order merely stated that the reply was not comprehensive and failed to consider the merits of the petitioner's explanation. - Consequently, HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the proper officer for re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
