Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Validity of draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - difference in numbers in closing and opening stock of Lingerie - The show cause notice lacked specific quantification of proposed additions to income - The High court directed that the draft assessment order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within three weeks. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing through video conferencing, before issuing a fresh draft assessment order.
Validity of draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - difference in numbers in closing and opening stock of Lingerie - The show cause notice lacked specific quantification of proposed additions to income - The High court directed that the draft assessment order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within three weeks. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing through video conferencing, before issuing a fresh draft assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.