Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - difference in numbers in closing and opening stock of Lingerie - The show cause notice lacked specific quantification of proposed additions to income - The High court directed that the draft assessment order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within three weeks. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing through video conferencing, before issuing a fresh draft assessment order.
Validity of draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - difference in numbers in closing and opening stock of Lingerie - The show cause notice lacked specific quantification of proposed additions to income - The High court directed that the draft assessment order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within three weeks. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing through video conferencing, before issuing a fresh draft assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
