Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - difference in numbers in closing and opening stock of Lingerie - The show cause notice lacked specific quantification of proposed additions to income - The High court directed that the draft assessment order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within three weeks. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing through video conferencing, before issuing a fresh draft assessment order.
Validity of draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - difference in numbers in closing and opening stock of Lingerie - The show cause notice lacked specific quantification of proposed additions to income - The High court directed that the draft assessment order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within three weeks. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing through video conferencing, before issuing a fresh draft assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.