Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - bogus share capital/share premium - The tribunal noted that the appellant's company had witnessed significant growth over the years, leading to a substantial increase in the value of its shares. The ITAT also considered the financial status of the share subscribers, who demonstrated ample net worth to justify their investments. - Furthermore, the ITAT emphasized that the provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act, relating to the valuation of shares, were not applicable to the assessment year in question. It was concluded that the addition of the unexplained cash credit was unjustified.
Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - bogus share capital/share premium - The tribunal noted that the appellant's company had witnessed significant growth over the years, leading to a substantial increase in the value of its shares. The ITAT also considered the financial status of the share subscribers, who demonstrated ample net worth to justify their investments. - Furthermore, the ITAT emphasized that the provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act, relating to the valuation of shares, were not applicable to the assessment year in question. It was concluded that the addition of the unexplained cash credit was unjustified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
