Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Revision u/s 263 - Genuineness of expenditure (Commission paid) - The ITAT found that the commission agreement was genuine, payments were made through banking channels, and tax was deducted at source, supporting the legitimacy of the transaction. Despite the substantial amount of commission paid, the ITAT emphasized that the genuineness of the transaction should be verified, which was found to be in order. The discrepancy in GST calculations and reported figures was deemed irrelevant by the ITAT. - The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order passed by the Ld. Pr. CIT under Section 263.
Revision u/s 263 - Genuineness of expenditure (Commission paid) - The ITAT found that the commission agreement was genuine, payments were made through banking channels, and tax was deducted at source, supporting the legitimacy of the transaction. Despite the substantial amount of commission paid, the ITAT emphasized that the genuineness of the transaction should be verified, which was found to be in order. The discrepancy in GST calculations and reported figures was deemed irrelevant by the ITAT. - The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order passed by the Ld. Pr. CIT under Section 263.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.