Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to inadequate verification. - The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Principal Commissioner's decision, stating that the AO had not adequately examined the sources of cash deposits nor obtained relevant details or evidence before accepting explanations. The appellant failed to provide documentary evidence supporting claims, and the AO's assessment lacked thorough inquiry.
Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to inadequate verification. - The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Principal Commissioner's decision, stating that the AO had not adequately examined the sources of cash deposits nor obtained relevant details or evidence before accepting explanations. The appellant failed to provide documentary evidence supporting claims, and the AO's assessment lacked thorough inquiry.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
