Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Rectification u/s 154 - under-assessment of income qua the foregoing depreciation/additional depreciation issue(s) - The Tribunal considered the Revenue’s contentions but found no merit in them. It was observed that the rectification proceedings under section 154 initiated by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable, as they involved a detailed re-computation of the assessee’s depreciation claims, which went beyond rectifying apparent mistakes on record. - In light of the decision of Supreme Court, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)’s decision.
Rectification u/s 154 - under-assessment of income qua the foregoing depreciation/additional depreciation issue(s) - The Tribunal considered the Revenue’s contentions but found no merit in them. It was observed that the rectification proceedings under section 154 initiated by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable, as they involved a detailed re-computation of the assessee’s depreciation claims, which went beyond rectifying apparent mistakes on record. - In light of the decision of Supreme Court, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)’s decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.