Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Rectification u/s 154 - under-assessment of income qua the foregoing depreciation/additional depreciation issue(s) - The Tribunal considered the Revenue’s contentions but found no merit in them. It was observed that the rectification proceedings under section 154 initiated by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable, as they involved a detailed re-computation of the assessee’s depreciation claims, which went beyond rectifying apparent mistakes on record. - In light of the decision of Supreme Court, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)’s decision.
Rectification u/s 154 - under-assessment of income qua the foregoing depreciation/additional depreciation issue(s) - The Tribunal considered the Revenue’s contentions but found no merit in them. It was observed that the rectification proceedings under section 154 initiated by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable, as they involved a detailed re-computation of the assessee’s depreciation claims, which went beyond rectifying apparent mistakes on record. - In light of the decision of Supreme Court, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)’s decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.