Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Benefit under the SHIS Scheme (Status Holder Incentive Scheme) - Import of Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device - Goods were considered as not falling within the category of "relating to plastic sector" - The Customs department initially accepted the goods as used but later contradicted this finding based on revised reports from Shri N J Lalwani. (Valuer) - The Tribunal found merit in the impugned order, stating that all necessary documents were provided to the appellant for cross-examination. - However, in the interest of justice, the Tribunal allowed one last opportunity for the appellant to cross-examine Government approved valuer and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication.
Benefit under the SHIS Scheme (Status Holder Incentive Scheme) - Import of Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device - Goods were considered as not falling within the category of "relating to plastic sector" - The Customs department initially accepted the goods as used but later contradicted this finding based on revised reports from Shri N J Lalwani. (Valuer) - The Tribunal found merit in the impugned order, stating that all necessary documents were provided to the appellant for cross-examination. - However, in the interest of justice, the Tribunal allowed one last opportunity for the appellant to cross-examine Government approved valuer and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
