Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Benefit under the SHIS Scheme (Status Holder Incentive Scheme) - Import of Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device - Goods were considered as not falling within the category of "relating to plastic sector" - The Customs department initially accepted the goods as used but later contradicted this finding based on revised reports from Shri N J Lalwani. (Valuer) - The Tribunal found merit in the impugned order, stating that all necessary documents were provided to the appellant for cross-examination. - However, in the interest of justice, the Tribunal allowed one last opportunity for the appellant to cross-examine Government approved valuer and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication.
Benefit under the SHIS Scheme (Status Holder Incentive Scheme) - Import of Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device - Goods were considered as not falling within the category of "relating to plastic sector" - The Customs department initially accepted the goods as used but later contradicted this finding based on revised reports from Shri N J Lalwani. (Valuer) - The Tribunal found merit in the impugned order, stating that all necessary documents were provided to the appellant for cross-examination. - However, in the interest of justice, the Tribunal allowed one last opportunity for the appellant to cross-examine Government approved valuer and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.