Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Benefit under the SHIS Scheme (Status Holder Incentive Scheme) - Import of Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device - Goods were considered as not falling within the category of "relating to plastic sector" - The Customs department initially accepted the goods as used but later contradicted this finding based on revised reports from Shri N J Lalwani. (Valuer) - The Tribunal found merit in the impugned order, stating that all necessary documents were provided to the appellant for cross-examination. - However, in the interest of justice, the Tribunal allowed one last opportunity for the appellant to cross-examine Government approved valuer and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication.
Benefit under the SHIS Scheme (Status Holder Incentive Scheme) - Import of Turning Cradle and Blade Shell Lifting Device - Goods were considered as not falling within the category of "relating to plastic sector" - The Customs department initially accepted the goods as used but later contradicted this finding based on revised reports from Shri N J Lalwani. (Valuer) - The Tribunal found merit in the impugned order, stating that all necessary documents were provided to the appellant for cross-examination. - However, in the interest of justice, the Tribunal allowed one last opportunity for the appellant to cross-examine Government approved valuer and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.