Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution Plan. - The NCLAT held that obtaining MSME status post-CIRP commencement does not disqualify a corporate debtor from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the IBC. - The NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority overstepped its jurisdiction by questioning the MSME status of the corporate debtor, as the authority to grant or revoke MSME registration lies solely with the competent authority under the MSME Act.
Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution Plan. - The NCLAT held that obtaining MSME status post-CIRP commencement does not disqualify a corporate debtor from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the IBC. - The NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority overstepped its jurisdiction by questioning the MSME status of the corporate debtor, as the authority to grant or revoke MSME registration lies solely with the competent authority under the MSME Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.