Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Money Laundering - Limitations of Enforcement Directorate's Powers under PMLA - The High Court found no overreach in the ED's actions, stating that the ED was within its rights to share information with the police for further action, and that the communication did not amount to a directive to register an FIR but was merely sharing of information based on credible evidence of illegal activities. - The Court found that the FIR was based on predicate offenses cognizable under the IPC, and the subsequent actions by the ED and police were in accordance with their statutory duties.
Money Laundering - Limitations of Enforcement Directorate's Powers under PMLA - The High Court found no overreach in the ED's actions, stating that the ED was within its rights to share information with the police for further action, and that the communication did not amount to a directive to register an FIR but was merely sharing of information based on credible evidence of illegal activities. - The Court found that the FIR was based on predicate offenses cognizable under the IPC, and the subsequent actions by the ED and police were in accordance with their statutory duties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.