Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of principles of natural justice - Opportunity of personal haring not provided - discretion to grant an adjournment - The petitioner sought an extension to respond to a show-cause notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. Despite the petitioner's request, the respondent passed the final order without considering the extension application. The court found the respondent's actions to be a colorable exercise of power, violating principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file its response by 15th March, 2024.
Violation of principles of natural justice - Opportunity of personal haring not provided - discretion to grant an adjournment - The petitioner sought an extension to respond to a show-cause notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. Despite the petitioner's request, the respondent passed the final order without considering the extension application. The court found the respondent's actions to be a colorable exercise of power, violating principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file its response by 15th March, 2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.