Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High court held that the proper officer failed to adequately consider the petitioner's reply on its merits and did not afford the petitioner an opportunity to clarify or provide further details. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication, directing the officer to specify the required details/documents within one week.
Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High court held that the proper officer failed to adequately consider the petitioner's reply on its merits and did not afford the petitioner an opportunity to clarify or provide further details. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication, directing the officer to specify the required details/documents within one week.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
