Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory interpretation and judicial precedents, the High court affirms that the mandatory nature of providing a personal hearing is clear under Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017, irrespective of whether a request for such a hearing is made by the affected party. - The court quashes the orders passed by the authorities and directs the respondent to grant the petitioner a proper opportunity for a personal hearing before passing any further orders.
Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory interpretation and judicial precedents, the High court affirms that the mandatory nature of providing a personal hearing is clear under Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017, irrespective of whether a request for such a hearing is made by the affected party. - The court quashes the orders passed by the authorities and directs the respondent to grant the petitioner a proper opportunity for a personal hearing before passing any further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
