Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory interpretation and judicial precedents, the High court affirms that the mandatory nature of providing a personal hearing is clear under Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017, irrespective of whether a request for such a hearing is made by the affected party. - The court quashes the orders passed by the authorities and directs the respondent to grant the petitioner a proper opportunity for a personal hearing before passing any further orders.
Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory interpretation and judicial precedents, the High court affirms that the mandatory nature of providing a personal hearing is clear under Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017, irrespective of whether a request for such a hearing is made by the affected party. - The court quashes the orders passed by the authorities and directs the respondent to grant the petitioner a proper opportunity for a personal hearing before passing any further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
