Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
TP Adjustment - Allowability of intergroup payment of management fees - principle of consistency - The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found that the assessee failed to provide adequate evidence to substantiate the receipt and the economic benefits derived from the services allegedly provided by its AEs. - It was noted that, it is surprising that though the assessee has relied on OECD guidelines, but at the same time it is forgetting that the OECD guidelines clearly provides for Benefit Test for payment of intra group services and also the benefit test is duly recognized as several countries as mentioned by TPO/OECD in its commentary. - The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, affirming the Revenue's stance that there was insufficient evidence to justify the claimed payments towards management services.
TP Adjustment - Allowability of intergroup payment of management fees - principle of consistency - The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found that the assessee failed to provide adequate evidence to substantiate the receipt and the economic benefits derived from the services allegedly provided by its AEs. - It was noted that, it is surprising that though the assessee has relied on OECD guidelines, but at the same time it is forgetting that the OECD guidelines clearly provides for Benefit Test for payment of intra group services and also the benefit test is duly recognized as several countries as mentioned by TPO/OECD in its commentary. - The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, affirming the Revenue's stance that there was insufficient evidence to justify the claimed payments towards management services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
