Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds for considering an order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - The tribunal found the section 263 order to be unjustifiable for multiple reasons, including the absence of a clear failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for its assessment, and quashed the order. - Revision order quashed.
Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds for considering an order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - The tribunal found the section 263 order to be unjustifiable for multiple reasons, including the absence of a clear failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for its assessment, and quashed the order. - Revision order quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
