Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds for considering an order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - The tribunal found the section 263 order to be unjustifiable for multiple reasons, including the absence of a clear failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for its assessment, and quashed the order. - Revision order quashed.
Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds for considering an order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - The tribunal found the section 263 order to be unjustifiable for multiple reasons, including the absence of a clear failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for its assessment, and quashed the order. - Revision order quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
