Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CIRP - Liability to pay transfer fee of 10% of the prevailing market value of the Kharagpur land - The court determines the validity of notices issued by the respondents demanding a transfer fee, despite the absence of approval for Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan by the adjudicating authority or appellate forums. It holds that since the Resolution Plan was not fully approved, the claims therein are not frozen and binding, allowing the respondents to demand the transfer fee. - The Calcutta High Court dismisses the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents' right to demand a transfer fee, as Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan was not approved.
CIRP - Liability to pay transfer fee of 10% of the prevailing market value of the Kharagpur land - The court determines the validity of notices issued by the respondents demanding a transfer fee, despite the absence of approval for Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan by the adjudicating authority or appellate forums. It holds that since the Resolution Plan was not fully approved, the claims therein are not frozen and binding, allowing the respondents to demand the transfer fee. - The Calcutta High Court dismisses the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents' right to demand a transfer fee, as Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan was not approved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
