Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
CIRP - Liability to pay transfer fee of 10% of the prevailing market value of the Kharagpur land - The court determines the validity of notices issued by the respondents demanding a transfer fee, despite the absence of approval for Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan by the adjudicating authority or appellate forums. It holds that since the Resolution Plan was not fully approved, the claims therein are not frozen and binding, allowing the respondents to demand the transfer fee. - The Calcutta High Court dismisses the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents' right to demand a transfer fee, as Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan was not approved.
CIRP - Liability to pay transfer fee of 10% of the prevailing market value of the Kharagpur land - The court determines the validity of notices issued by the respondents demanding a transfer fee, despite the absence of approval for Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan by the adjudicating authority or appellate forums. It holds that since the Resolution Plan was not fully approved, the claims therein are not frozen and binding, allowing the respondents to demand the transfer fee. - The Calcutta High Court dismisses the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents' right to demand a transfer fee, as Clause 15.15.5 of the Resolution Plan was not approved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
