Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Approval of the Resolution Plan - Appellant (Successful Resolution Applicant - SRA) submits that after approval of Resolution Plan of the Appellant by the CoC, there was no occasion for directing consideration of fresh settlement proposal submitted by Ex. Directors to be placed before the CoC - NCLAT noted that the Adjudicating Authority had passed the order without affording the appellant an opportunity to respond to the settlement proposal, which was deemed a violation of principles of natural justice. - The NCLAT set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and granted the appellant two weeks to file objections to the settlement proposal. - NCLT directed to consider the objections along with the settlement proposal in accordance with the law.
Approval of the Resolution Plan - Appellant (Successful Resolution Applicant - SRA) submits that after approval of Resolution Plan of the Appellant by the CoC, there was no occasion for directing consideration of fresh settlement proposal submitted by Ex. Directors to be placed before the CoC - NCLAT noted that the Adjudicating Authority had passed the order without affording the appellant an opportunity to respond to the settlement proposal, which was deemed a violation of principles of natural justice. - The NCLAT set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and granted the appellant two weeks to file objections to the settlement proposal. - NCLT directed to consider the objections along with the settlement proposal in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
