Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 - Interest expenditure debited as interest on securities - allegation of involvement in multi crore securities transactions scam of nineties infamously known as Harshad Mehta Scam, Assessee got labelled as party under the Special Court's (TORTS) Act, 1992 - The ITAT examined each addition separately, considering the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee. It concluded that the additions were not justified due to satisfactory explanations and evidence presented by the assessee. - The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no merit in the revenue's contentions.
Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 - Interest expenditure debited as interest on securities - allegation of involvement in multi crore securities transactions scam of nineties infamously known as Harshad Mehta Scam, Assessee got labelled as party under the Special Court's (TORTS) Act, 1992 - The ITAT examined each addition separately, considering the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee. It concluded that the additions were not justified due to satisfactory explanations and evidence presented by the assessee. - The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no merit in the revenue's contentions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
